Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace

Unthreaded

https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-legacy-go-it-alone-germany/

Feb 21, 2019 at 8:32 AM | Mark Hodgson

Two years ago, I thought Merkel represented the best hope of saving the EU. I was wrong.

German Green policies, German double standards and German hypocrisy are beautifully demonstrated by Nordstream. Of course Unreliable are useless, of course the EU needs fossil fuels, of course Germany must lead and control, having imposed rationing on everyone else.

Feb 21, 2019 at 10:11 AM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

"A charging point will need to be fitted outside your home by the car manufacturer’s chosen electric partner, for example British Gas."
Feb 21, 2019 at 8:29 AM | Mark Hodgson

Any clues as to how British Gas power their rechargers?

Feb 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

More evidence of EU arrogance, profligacy and incompetence:

"EU drugs agency told it can’t escape pricey London lease
Judge rules European Medicines Agency didn’t have to relocate because of Brexit."

https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-drugs-agency-told-it-cant-escape-pricey-london-lease-ema-brexit/

The European Medicines Agency was hoping Brexit would be a strong enough reason to exit its no-break £500 million London lease.

Instead, the agency now faces the prospect of paying double rent for the next 20 years following its relocation to Amsterdam.

The U.K. High Court on Wednesday rejected the EMA’s argument that its London lease was “frustrated” by Brexit, and said the agency “remains obliged to perform its obligations.”

That means the EMA must pay in the region of €18 million a year until 2039 in extra rental costs, unless it can find a suitable subletter for the highly specialized premises in Canary Wharf, east London.

The EMA said it is studying its options for appeal, but has been vocal on the impact the liabilities will have on the agency’s ability to meet its duties in protecting public health.

“Paying rent for two sets of headquarters despite only need[ing], and occupying, one headquarters, would be highly detrimental to the EMA,” Nerimantas Steikunas, the EMA’s interim head of corporate management and finance, said in testimony during the case.

The EMA will close the doors of its London office on March 1, where it has already held the farewell ceremony; it has begun moving staff to temporary headquarters in Amsterdam and construction is underway on a new headquarters, which it plans to move into in November. The EMA is expecting to pay around €13.6 million a year in rent for that site from 2020.

Steikunas said continuing to service its London lease until 2039 would “necessarily and fundamentally impact upon the EMA’s institutional effectiveness,” and that the costs are in the region of 15 percent of its staff budget — making the charge “akin to requiring the EMA to do without a substantial proportion of its current workforce.” The regulator, which is responsible for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of medicines for sale across the EU, has already been forced to delay or scale back a range of activities during the relocation.

In his ruling, Judge Marcus Smith suggested the EMA should have thought of that before deciding to relocate.

The judge determined that the EMA could have stayed in the U.K. — saying the “move from London to Amsterdam was not required as a matter of law.” Following the U.K.’s Brexit referendum, the EU institutions were clear that an EU agency could not remain in a non-member country, and the European Council initiated a bidding process to determine the new location.

Both the EMA and the EU must have considered the “additional cost” of that relocation and the financial implications of building a new facility, Smith wrote. “If they have not, then they should have done,” he added.

An EMA spokesperson said, “the Agency had no say and was not a party in the political and legislative process leading to the approval of Amsterdam as its new seat.”

Stating that the “EMA has a legal personality distinct from the EU institutions,” the agency said that, under the regulation adopted by the Council and European Parliament “who are not parties to the lease agreement, EMA has no choice but to leave London and move to Amsterdam on or before 30 March 2019.”

The EMA’s own former head of counsel noted shortly after the referendum that there is no law against keeping the drugs agency in the U.K.

After entering into an agreement to begin construction on the custom London headquarters in 2011, the agency in 2014 began a 25-year £500 million lease that was negotiated without a break clause to make it cheaper.

“The EMA chose to enter into a long-term relationship, with long-term obligations,” Smith observed in his judgment. “It could have opted for different premises, with a shorter lease; it could have negotiated a break and paid a (far) higher price and foregone the inducements it received. It did none of these things,” he said.

The ruling has implications for the next EU budget, running from 2021 to 2027, which is being negotiated in Brussels. With the U.K.’s departure set to leave a hole of up to €13 billion a year in the budget, countries are highly sensitive to how the money will be allocated.

Property lawyers in London were also watching the case closely since they said it would set strong precedent for other efforts to break contract leases. The EMA’s legal argument hinged on an arcane doctrine in English contract law known as “frustration,” stemming from a 1903 decision (Krell v. Henry) established after a man rented a room to watch King Edward VII’s coronation procession but then saw the procession canceled after the king got appendicitis.

“We fulfill our contracts and expect other parties with whom we enter contracts to respect the law and their own obligations, particularly in the case where a party is created and backed by an international institution,” Sir George Iacobescu, chairman and CEO of the Canary Wharf Group, said of the court’s decision to throw out the EMA’s claim.

“The high bar for frustration claims applies to all contracts, not just leases, and parties looking for an ‘out’ due to Brexit would need to formulate their claims very carefully to have a chance at success,” said Frances Richardson, head of real estate disputes at Linklaters, in a statement.

The EMA now needs to decide whether to appeal or find a subletter, which will be subject to its landlord’s approval. There will be a final hearing in the case before March 29 to determine who will pay the legal costs.

“The Agency continues to trust in the cooperation and goodwill of the Canary Wharf Group to find a mutually satisfactory solution before the end of March 2019,” the EMA spokesperson said.

[I love that last line - I trust the Canary Wharf Group shows the EMA the same cooperation and goodwill that the EU has shown the UK in finding a "mutually satisfactory solution" to Brexit].

Feb 21, 2019 at 8:36 AM | Unregistered CommenterMark Hodgson

"Merkel’s go-it-alone legacy
German chancellor’s unexpectedly soaring oratory can’t make up for years of failed foreign policy."

https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-legacy-go-it-alone-germany/

Feb 21, 2019 at 8:32 AM | Unregistered CommenterMark Hodgson

The announcement regarding the future closure of the Honda car plant made me wonder whether it shouldn't be taken over by the Government and used to build bespoke Motability cars, since the Motability scheme seems to be much abused, and many of these cars are gas-guzzlers, and not what one might expect from the scheme.

That drove me to the Motability website, where I found this:

"If you are looking to lease an electric vehicle, there are a couple of important things to consider:

Lifestyle
Electric vehicles are only suitable for people who travel shorter distances. Electric cars can only travel a certain distance before needing to be recharged so you should have an alternative form of transport available to you for longer journeys

Vehicle charging
A charging point will need to be fitted outside your home by the car manufacturer’s chosen electric partner, for example British Gas. In order to have a home charging point fitted you will need to have access to off-road parking such as a private driveway or garage.

Before you place your application, your dealer will run through some important details to make sure the car is suitable for your needs."

If electric cars come with a heavy caveat (for the obvious reasons) from the Motability scheme, then I think it's fair to say they're a non-starter (pardon the pun) for the nation as a whole.

Feb 21, 2019 at 8:29 AM | Unregistered CommenterMark Hodgson

wacky
8am R Lincs news "And gas appliances could be banned from installation in new homes, to meet Climate Goals"
... I'm pretty sure they won't
R4 news phrased it differently .."The CCC has said that carbon from heating has to be reduced to zero"

I was at a concert yesterday, the heating was on full blast, so I asked the staff
..and they instead of turning the heating down, put on the aircon as well.

Feb 21, 2019 at 8:12 AM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

stewgreen

Molly Scott Cato is one of my MEPs - she's an ignorant deluded idiot and the sooner she returns to living in a dilapidated caravan with 20 cats the better.

I'm puzzled by the electoral arithmetic that got the twerp into a £1500 a week job with unlimited expenses ....

Feb 21, 2019 at 2:02 AM | Registered Commentertomo

Paul Joseph Watson on the Climate School Strike

\\ Alternate headline:
Idiotic parents use their own children as *political human shields*
so their alarmist claims can't be challenged.//

Feb 21, 2019 at 12:29 AM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

Shell want's to sink an oil rig in British North sea
..but is facing great pressure from German Greenpeace

Feb 20, 2019 at 11:48 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

In the Times BP finally stuck up for plastics,
saying the problem with dreaming about banning all plastics
is that you'll end up with more food waste
and have more CO2 from all the estra transport

So then in the letters page the GreenBlob NGOs responded with an angry letter

Feb 20, 2019 at 11:45 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

PostCreate a New Post

Enter your information below to create a new post.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>