Interview in El Reg

There's an interview with one A.W. Montford Esq just gone up at the Register.

Comments

[Gurgeh]

And a very good interview it is, Your Grace!

[Jiminy Cricket]

Andrew Orlowski was the journalist who made me feel like I was not alone in my skepticism of the way science was behaving. it was through him that the whole skeptic world was opened up to me.

[John]

Bravo!

[Prof Jones's Mum]

My Lord Bishop,
You don't have a deacon's job spare do you? My son, he's a good boy, he'll be looking for work shortly. You could talk about the weather.
Yours most sincerely

A Loving Mum.

[James P]

Excellent! My two favourite websites cuddling up and exchanging links...

Might I admire the might of your Mitre?

[Dennis]

Good stuff.

Twas Vulture Central that orginally sent me here...

[Ruhroh]

Sir,;

I'd like to understand the source of that graphic that shows the LIA, PDO, red/blue, and the parabolic IPCC runaway.
Is that 'from the litrazure' of a kind that my alarmist sparring partner might acknowledge?

I'm always on the lookout for simple, self-contained graphix that tell the story in one picture, and I like that one.
TIA
RR

[BH adds: That isn't from my book. You'll have to ask Orlowski]

[E O'Connor]

@Ruhroh

Do you like Figure 9.2: 'Mann at the centre of a paleoclimate web' in the book?

Yer Grace

Small typo in the title for figure 9.2.

[Anand]

Nice interview. I have to slightly disagree with you on the nature of funding being a source of conflict bit. Most scientists just put their heads down and work towards results. The Team is an exception in that regard. I thought you generalized a bit too strongly on that point.

Regards
Anand

[dread0]

Excellent, and you spotted that (almost) unbelievable quote by Esper as well.

[page 92, for those who like to a joke]

http://www.treeringsociety.org/TRBTRR/TRRvol59_2_81-98.pdf