Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« Longannet to close | Main | Ringberg »
Monday
Mar232015

National Trust wants to clearcut North American forests

Dame Helen Ghosh, the former Whitehall bureaucrat who now runs the National Trust, was on the Today programme this morning explaining why climate change is the biggest threat to the Trust's work.

Pressed to explain herself, Dame Helen had almost nothing to justify her position, apart from a suggestion that the Trust likes to address the issues of the day. This came across to me as saying "we just jump on any passing bandwagon, it's good for business".

She did mumble something about declines in house sparrow and hedgehog populations. Unfortunately for this case, the fall in sparrow numbers appears to be due to changes in farming practices, to cats, and to pesticides, and in hedgehog numbers because of habitat loss. Dame Helen is therefore engaging in some pretty misleading scaremongering on the climate front.

When pressed on whether people should stop burning fossil fuels she again waffled, before saying that the Trust was going to be getting most of its energy from renewables. Interestingly, she didn't mention windfarms, no doubt because she might have been hammered on the "desecration of the uplands" front (although on the BBC she would presumably have been safe enough). Instead she spoke of hydro schemes and biomass boilers.

Given that wood pellets are being imported from North American forests that are clearcut for the purpose, this does seem quite a strange policy for the National Trust to adopt. Is this really what the National Trust wants to see happening?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (59)

What kind of trees are being turned in to ground unicorn horn? If it's pine then thats a problem as pines makes the land around them uninhabitable plus they take, what, around 7 years to mature.

Also, it seems to me using wood for commercial power stations is something new so the wood being used now can't have been planted nearly a decade ago purposely because the demand didn't exist then?

Mailman

Mar 23, 2015 at 9:45 PM | Unregistered Commentermailman

I've read that Scandinavian woodchips are used in a Canadian biomass electric power plant because only two sources of pellets met the specifications; the other wasn't in Canada, either.
==================

Mar 23, 2015 at 11:28 PM | Unregistered Commenterkim

The house sparrow decline was undoubtedly down to the home improvement grants of the 1980's. All those broken soffits and facias replaced in all the cities.

Mar 23, 2015 at 11:41 PM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Schofield

Just cancelled by NT membership; I wish I could do the same with my BBC licence fee

Mar 24, 2015 at 9:17 AM | Unregistered Commenterhedgehogsanonymous

David Schofield
Definitely something more to the sparrow decline than the (modest) loss of suburban nest sites you point out. Actually, decline was greatest in rural areas, which might point to the increase in raptors and corvids, or to the general tidyiing-up of fields and farmyards, but I'm not convinced. You'll find people going round saying things like 'habitat loss' whenever we note an increasing scarcity of something, but that rarely is a proper answer for very widespread (in this case worldwide) species. I've not yet seen any explanation that satisfies me. In my part of the country there was a quite rapid decline through the 90s, when sparrows completely disappeared from some localities, but I am pleased to say that they have gradually re-colonised pretty much all the areas from which they disappeared. Some untracked disease seems possible. I recall a well-regarded birder once telling me 'sparrow numbers go in 100-yr cycles'. Interestingly, they are communal birds, which seem more vulnerable to large fluctuations than solitary species (cf. passenger pigeon?)

Mar 24, 2015 at 9:29 AM | Unregistered Commentermothcatcher

Contradiction of the fossil fuel disinvestment - Green/left calls for it
whilst at the same time provoking policies in the NT and BBC which cause us to disinvest from them ansd sto[ being members.

It would not surprise me if the trustees are actually breaking the terms of the legacies in that they are behaving in a way which does not achieve the maximum benefit for mans appreciation of nature and history.
(.. Note the way the law applies to company directors re tax efficiency ..They are not free to make political "feel good" decisions but rather are obliged to maximise shareholder returns whist obeying the law.
It is up to the government to set the laws to the benefit of humanity.)

- I think that it is a pity that once a charity or political party is hijacked by loony activists that we let them get away with it. Rather we should stay and wrestle them out.

Mar 24, 2015 at 10:22 AM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

Gecko, you are spouting nonsense. Either that, or you have swallowed the Drax propaganda. Enviva, Drax's main supplier, IS cutting down great swathes of majestic bottomland forest. I have seen this happening on the ground and the air. You owe me an apology.

Mar 24, 2015 at 12:11 PM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Rose

cats are an environmental hasard of the same size as Caroline Lucas
Unfortunately they are a sort of tamagoshis for wimmin who havent spawned young yet, too ugly or whatevah.
So we persist in having a sadistic predator of birds in our ecological system that distorts the whole balance.

Mar 24, 2015 at 1:12 PM | Unregistered CommenterVenuNotWarmerDueToCO2

There's now a transcript of Monday's interview with Helen Ghosh, here:
https://sites.google.com/site/mytranscriptbox/2015/20150323_r4

Mar 25, 2015 at 11:28 AM | Unregistered CommenterAlex Cull

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>