Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« UK energy prices unaffordable by 2015 | Main | Tim Osborn responds to the Yamal furore »
Thursday
May312012

That's telling him

This just in from the Telegraph:

Peter Atherton, Citigroup’s head of utilities research, said the SNP’s radical renewable power targets require up to £7 billion of investment a year but the figure at the moment is only £750 million.

The industry expert, who advises the bank's clients where to invest their money, said utility share prices are “dire” and green energy manufacturers have proved a “terrible, catastrophic investment” in recent years.

It is “borderline fantasy” that this difference can be made good because banks and international investors do not think green energy schemes provide reliable returns, he said.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (56)

May 31, 2012 at 2:18 PM | Keith Macdonald

You'll be able to get no problem, Just convert your currency at the border. £1 (English) = 5p (Scottish)

No wonder it used to take a spanner to get threepence out of a Scotsman's hand!

May 31, 2012 at 5:17 PM | Unregistered CommenterBilly Liar

I also noticed the Telegraph report J4R refers to above, green cars too popular on account of lower Tax A, so government answer, increase Tax B. If government didn't work on auto-pilot, they might learn something here. Its a simple thing: people don't like paying tax, and if offered the opportunity, in return for changing behaviour (purchasing habits for example), to pay less tax, they will take the opportunity. So a thinking government might think, if we did a lot less pointless things and reduced taxes a lot, we would be liked a lot, and be a shoe-in for the next election. Sadly thats not how they think. They think, 'we have to raise £750bn so if source A dries up, we'll make it up from source B'. How about reflecting on the fact that public spending was £450bn 10 years ago, and that (apart from a third accounted for by inflation) nearly all the rest is down to G Browns cash-for-votes wheezes, most of which could be undone without the world ending. The Climate Change Act. Teaching Assistants. Tax credits. Loads and loads of others. Less tax = more votes. If they can grasp one Laffer curve, lower tax = more revenue, why can;t they grasp the other one?

May 31, 2012 at 5:40 PM | Unregistered Commenterbill

I rarely comment on political matters but I have to say that Alastair Darling is the only poli in recent years for whom I could muster what on a good day could just about pass for respect.

May 31, 2012 at 7:26 PM | Unregistered CommenterDolphinhead

If Scotland does become an independent green nirvana will they please take The Prince of Wales with them when they leave.

Jun 1, 2012 at 3:57 AM | Unregistered Commentermichael hart

A rare moment of sanity from the banking sector. Let us hope there will be more before they completely run out of other peoples' money.

Jun 1, 2012 at 7:26 AM | Unregistered Commentersimpleseekeraftertruth

ConfusedPhoton - "Lets hope sanity returns soon before our economy implodes and we double the number of people in fuel poverty."

It is official Government policy throughout the UK that we should not use energy or water (although I think Scotland might be exempt on that one) in the future - if you don't use it you can't be in poverty. You could of course be dead.

Jun 2, 2012 at 11:19 AM | Unregistered CommenterRetired Dave

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>