Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« Are science writers all lefties? | Main | Cranmer on Buerk »
Saturday
Feb122011

Commenting problems again

I now have the ability to switch off Captcha, so I'm going to try this to see if it makes any difference to the ongoing problems with comments and timeouts and so on. Let me know if it helps.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (62)

So there is.

Feb 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM | Unregistered Commentertimheyes

I never use preview, never mess with HTML, am OK with captcha and never have had problems.

Feb 13, 2011 at 9:10 PM | Unregistered CommenterPharos

Shub
Astrology is a science, court rules
And of course, an alchemist is a pharmacologist?

I have a witch doctor doctor I would like the the learned judge to have treat him.

Feb 13, 2011 at 9:51 PM | Unregistered CommenterDon Pablo de la Sierra

I wonder if a high proportion of CAGW fans are Pisces ;^)

Feb 13, 2011 at 10:03 PM | Unregistered CommenterFrosty

Bishop Hill

[BH adds. I'm not sure about this. Page load times still seem very fast, an impression confirmed by my Alexa page. I've had a virtually trouble-free experience with SQ so far, so I'm cutting them some slack].

I think you have a great deal to learn about the internet, particularly on my side of the pond. Your service provider is doing a randy job on you outside the UK. Alexa doesn't tell you diddy squat about the problem which is the goddamn Captcha handing server, which had NOTHING to do with Alexa.

You are a bright lad, but there is much you need to learn about networking.

My point is your service provider is PISSING off your clients. That is BAD MANAGEMENT. You appear to have an attitude right of the MET OFFICE which is "Well It looks good."

When it is frecking freezing and your customers are saying that it is, please don't tell us it is balmy and warm.

Get out of the #$%$#* UK and see what a mess your site is.

And as for paying you to be a member of the #$$(#* site, good luck. It sucks as it is now. Get them to fix the #$($*# problem, which is they have a single threaded queue for the Captcha server for your site, which isn't smart enough to buffer to disk. Damn stupid and beyond belief. Christ, I fixed problems like this 40 years ago. You would think they taught it in computer grammar school by now.

</rant>

Feb 13, 2011 at 10:14 PM | Unregistered CommenterDon Pablo de la Sierra

Don Pablo,
I just learned that our friend, the beloved Professor Cox managed to tick off the Astrological Association of Great Britain with his comments about astrology. So the Telegraph piece was interesting. :)

What a bunch of strange people, these Cox, Singh, Goldacre etc are! Taking on astrologers....heroic indeed.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-lay-scientist/2011/jan/24/1

Feb 13, 2011 at 11:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterShub

Don Pablo

The vagaries of the BH blog are a pain. Granted. But at least it's here ;-)

Feb 14, 2011 at 12:03 AM | Unregistered CommenterBBD

Hmm, I wonder if Cox, Singh, and Goldacre approve of people with buttons? The last time the UK ejected a band of annoying puritans, it didn't turn out too well.

Feb 14, 2011 at 1:16 AM | Unregistered CommenterZT

BBD
Don Pablo
The vagaries of the BH blog are a pain. Granted. But at least it's here ;-)

Perhaps if you had the day I had yesterday (Saturday) you would call it more a pain than "vagaries", but, as always, you are right on, my good friend. At least it is there. And this does belong to BH, not me. It is his ePub, not mine. I just wish some of the hired help washed their code more carefully.

Shub
You don't suppose the saccharine personality will finally wear thin? Nice boy, but still a boy is our little Brian the Brain. Loved "in the interests of balance on the BBC, yes astrology is nonsense." I wonder when he will say ""in the interests of balance on the BBC, yes AGW is nonsense."

Best expect the server to stop puking first.

Feb 14, 2011 at 2:34 AM | Unregistered CommenterDon Pablo de la Sierra

“I fixed problems like this 40 years ago”

Ah those were the days coal fired computer systems with a laptop the size of a house. Steady!

Feb 14, 2011 at 8:30 AM | Unregistered Commentermartyn

martyn

Ah those were the days coal fired computer systems with a laptop the size of a house. Steady!

I'm talking IBM 360 and 370's, and DEC PDP-11 and VAXs, You could heat your house with a PDP-11, and I actually spent one night sleeping on top of one. It was very common in Maynard, Mass among the software hackers (as we called ourselves) to do all nighters and nap where it was warm. Several cats lived in the Mill as well and were fond of the larger PDP-11s and then VAXs.

When I worked for DEC at Bell Labs in Holmdel Labs, they actually heated the whole building by moving air from the computer rooms to the rest.

Yeap, them were the days. Today I have a IBM 370 195 emulator running on my older computer for fun. It uses nearly 6MB of "core" and about 25 MB of disk space. A monster machine in its day. Today, the average smart phone is two or three magnitudes faster. Yet, we still seem to have software from the 1960's . Very sad.

Feb 14, 2011 at 2:55 PM | Unregistered CommenterDon Pablo de la Sierra

More about the 'skeptics'

http://www.hampshireskeptics.org/

Pretty cool, eh?

How come, they have all the energy in the world to fight homoepathy, superstition, gods and angels, creationism and ghost hunting?

Nothing for CAGW?

Feb 14, 2011 at 5:30 PM | Unregistered CommenterShub

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>