Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Support

 

Twitter
Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace

Unthreaded

@stew,

Where are you flying to?

Nov 19, 2017 at 7:09 PM | Registered CommenterPcar

The point is
Racism is a rare action of people labelled right wing
Although the broad church does include psychos who have been horrible and assaulted people cos of their race.

Just like the left includes
#1 Some people that believe it's OK to seize all of rich people's wealth
#2 Some psychos like the Red Brigade who used actual violence to that aim.

Nov 19, 2017 at 5:29 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

On forums libmob shout "racist" to close down dogma challengers.
Now I spot BBC building a similar false narrative that everyone not in the box marked liberal is in a box marked "right wing" AND that equals "racist=" far right"="alt right"= "fascist"
.. And that new segregation rules apply so it's only right that "right wing" be segregated out of debate and public airwaves.

Ffs : the political left contains the Red Brigade and Stalin , but that doesn't mean that entire broad church are terrorists.

The BBC does a number of progs where "right wing" is shouted every 40 seconds like a kind of Tourette's

Nov 19, 2017 at 4:47 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

Just used some of my big oil money to hitch hike up to Newcastle and walk to the airport. (A lot of standing around but got a second lift right there)
From M62 looks like Drax has only one smoke chimney , not 100% clean.

Up the road Ferrybridge stood idle.Yet right next door something like a power plant is under construction.

Nov 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

http://joannenova.com.au/2017/11/not-powering-past-coal-20-countries-that-didnt-use-much-coal-agree-to-not-use-much-coal/

Some wonderful lists of hypocrisy and stupidity in the waste trail of COP23, that leads back to "Climate Science"

Nov 19, 2017 at 10:21 AM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

More sureal every week

PM May: "I am number one, you are number 12,345,678"
Pcar: "I am not a number, I am a free man"

May latest on swapping online freedom for "compliance"

Socialist "Not The Conservative" party still expanding the surveillance state despite their failure to win a majority government in June. The problem is other parties are not interested in internet freedom and civil liberties either so will likely vote with May's plans

Was May's choice of clothing deliberate, a faux-pas or subconsciously revealing her regressive, puritanical true beliefs?

Nov 19, 2017 at 12:40 AM | Registered CommenterPcar

@golf charlie, Nov 18, 2017 at 1:33 PM

Another Musk/Tesla launch delayed.

http://www.spacex.com/webcast

ZUMA MISSION

ROFL - I noticed "ZUMA MISSION" first, then "Musk" and thought Musk was launching a - much needed - coup in South Africa.

Nov 19, 2017 at 12:39 AM | Registered CommenterPcar

Nov 18, 2017 at 9:44 PM | Mark Hodgson

The prospect of growing biodiesel as a crop, is why the EU and UK encouraged people to switch to diesel engines. The USA has grown huge amounts of biodiesel, wiping out their surplus, causing world food prices to rise. The UN has not had large quantities of US grain to give away. The Guardian got it right!
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/jul/03/biofuels.renewableenergy

If diesel engines cause the same pollution whether the fuel is derived from plants or crude oil, and evidence that 40,000 people die due to diesel, there is little to encourage further biodiesel. It has all been a very damaging and expensive mistake.

How many of the alleged 40,000 deaths a year, should the Green Blob be held liable for?

Nov 18, 2017 at 10:32 PM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

Could a new renewables law doom all biofuels in Europe?

https://www.politico.eu/sponsored-content/could-a-new-renewables-law-doom-all-biofuels-in-europe/

"The European Parliament is considering the Commission’s RED II proposal to cap the amount of biofuels that can be used to meet EU renewable energy targets. Proponents of the idea say it will prevent biofuels from causing land use change and cause more emissions than they abate. But others fear that the proposal ignores biofuels’ benefits for the environment by indiscriminately bracketing all biofuels together, even those that are not causing adverse impacts."

Nov 18, 2017 at 9:44 PM | Unregistered CommenterMark Hodgson
Nov 18, 2017 at 7:35 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

PostCreate a New Post

Enter your information below to create a new post.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>