Click images for more details



Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
  • Jun 24 - michael hart on
    COP 23
  • Jun 24 - Mark Hodgson on
    COP 23

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace


Apr 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM | Dung

Dung, that quote came from an interview last year - the underlying Welt Online article is dated 15.07.2011, It caused a bit of a stir at the time - rightly so as the research supported (at least to some degree) a Svensmark effect.

I suspect the Principia article is just displaying the current date at the top of the page.

Here's a link to some discussion at WUWT

Apr 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM | Registered Commenterwoodentop

an interesting perspective from Texas

it is quite thought-provoking but it feels right that "It sounds paradoxical, but if you think about it a bit you’ll realize it’s true: the more extreme the temperature anomaly, the smaller the relative contribution from climate change and the greater the importance of other weather factors".

Apr 11, 2012 at 4:46 PM | Unregistered Commenterdiogenes

Nick Clegg speech on the green economy

"I'll be representing the UK at the Rio+20 Summit in the summer where I'll be pushing for greater global protections for our natural assets."

Apr 11, 2012 at 4:36 PM | Unregistered CommenterFrosty

CERN Chief Forbids Scientists Discussing CLOUD Experiment

Nigel Calder reports:

Although still very busy with other work, I keep looking out for results from the CLOUD experiment at CERN in Geneva, which is testing Henrik Svensmark’s hypothesis that cosmic rays help to make clouds. They are due for publication this summer. All I have just now is a startling remark by Rolf-Dieter Heuer, Director General of CERN, in an interview by Welt Online a few days ago.


Apr 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM | Unregistered CommenterDung

An Engineering Approach to Understanding the Climate Change Controversy - NASA

The first of two planned symposiums was held on September 12, 2011 and was quite successful with 77 people attending. The meeting was conducted as planned, (see agenda below for details on the schedule and the speakers) We had a significant amount of discussions between the panels members and the audience especially during the panel discussions and after the formal meeting. Briefing charts used by the speakers during the meeting will be posted on our web site within the next few weeks as they become available. Thanks to all the speakers for their excellent presentations and for allowing us to put their briefing charts on our web site.

These are the types of meetings that are not promoted by the media, well worth a read through the presentation notes!

Apr 11, 2012 at 1:36 PM | Registered CommenterLord Beaverbrook

More Good News!

Scientists monitoring water flow in streams at test sites across the USA have found, unexpectedly, that the global warming seen in the late 20th century had basically no effect on most of the ecosystems they studied.

Are we finally seeing a shift in attitude towards alarmism?

Apr 11, 2012 at 12:18 PM | Unregistered CommenterJace

Good News!

The amount of floating ice in the Arctic's Bering Sea - which had long been expected to retreat disastrously by climate-Cassandra organisations such as Greenpeace - reached all-time record high levels last month, according to US researchers monitoring the area using satellites.

Apr 11, 2012 at 12:09 PM | Unregistered CommenterJace

Apr 10, 2012 at 8:42 PM Skiphil

... will they ever admit it and mend their ways??

Will a leopard ever change its spots?

Apr 11, 2012 at 8:27 AM | Registered CommenterMartin A

More disgrace for the IPCC but will they ever admit it and mend their ways?? See here:

Apr 10, 2012 at 8:42 PM | Registered CommenterSkiphil

This could be important. It will certainly be useful:
The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.

Extract from open letter to the NASA Administrator just published on WUWT from experienced ex-employees of NASA:

So many have been convinced, or at least been able to avoid thinking things through, by deferring to authorities such as the now shabby Royal Society, that this little undermining of NASA's odious role in the alarm business is at least a little bit encouraging for those of us who have failed to be convinced by the case for alarm over CO2.

Apr 10, 2012 at 7:14 PM | Registered CommenterJohn Shade

PostCreate a New Post

Enter your information below to create a new post.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>