Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Support

 

Twitter
Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace

Unthreaded

ST - no problem. I didn't make any attempt to take account of the Earth's curvature. I just calculated the lateral force in newtons and as a fraction of Earth's gravitational force at sea-level. But having thought about it, the Earth's curvature will pose a serious complication for EM's flawed hypothesis as the distance between the masses increases; as the centre of mass of an 2km thick ice sheet will effectively be below the horizontal once the distance is greater than about 100km, thus further weakening the potential for the miniscule lateral force to lift the local sea level.

btw, it is lapogus with an el, as in grouse.

Feb 22, 2018 at 6:20 PM | Registered Commenterlapogus

Iapogus. Thanks for doing the recalculation. I was damned if I was going to waste my time. I was merely going to point out that gravity anomalies are measured in milliGalls for a good reason. Finally, EM failed to plot his calculation upon an appropriately curved surface. I suspect both his and your calculations ignore this aspect.

At one time I knew all this stuff. Then when I worked in combination with a geophysicist I left it to him (rarely a her). Then I had to relearn much of it again in order to second mark undergraduate projects. Over the past few years it has slowly sunk again from view (with a few remnant bergy bits remaining to spot the stupid).

Feb 22, 2018 at 5:25 PM | Unregistered CommenterSupertroll

What point in giving you data which you feel able to arbitrarily reject?
Made me giggle, given the provenance.

Feb 22, 2018 at 5:20 PM | Registered CommenterRadical Rodent

National Trust set to waste even more money in court.
Yes the trustees don't like fracking, but Ineos has a right to do seismic testing and NT refusing permission at Clumber Park
So Ineos are dragging them to court.

Feb 22, 2018 at 5:12 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

When the going gets tough electricity generators get coal going. Looking at the data for time of posting Coal is providing 18.17%, Nuclear 18.05% of demand and both at virtually maximum, wind supplying 8.52% and no where near capacity the French and Dutch inter connectors are on maximum too. No mention on the BBC though.

Feb 22, 2018 at 4:24 PM | Unregistered CommenterUibhist a Tuath

EM - I have used your figures for the mass of Schiehallion and GIS, and your distances of 560km and 3km respectively.

I get the resulting lateral force from these masses on a 1kg bob to be 0.000031 Newtons and 0.0009045 Newtons respectively.

Assuming that when you write your results of 0.1g and 0.9g you are expressing this force as a fraction of Earth gravity, (and not grammes), if so you are off by four orders of magnitude.

My answers expressed as a fraction of Earth gravity (using 9.81ms-2) are: 3.174 x 10^-6 g for Schiehallion and 9.22 x 10-5 g for the GIS.

I think you have forgotten to convert the 560km distance into metres.

I reiterate that if you think this miniscule lateral force is enough to create a 30m rise in local sea-level around Greenland you are beyond help.

In future please read my comments before dismissing them. I did not say the paper you linked to was bollocks, I said the paper clearly identified the gravitational anomalies as being due to differeing densities in the Earth's magna core (I said your explanation/reason for the apparent 30m sea level increase around Greenland being due to the mass of the ice sheet was bollocks). And don't insult my intelligence again. And go and get help, your delusions appear to be giving you a severe case of confrimation bias.

Feb 22, 2018 at 4:03 PM | Registered Commenterlapogus

EM. Indeed not. In my time I have collected dozens of sediment cores in Florida Bay where walking in places is nigh near impossible (you sink in the mud up to your hips). Taking cores in these settings is relatively easy, once you get to the site, because the sediments offer so little resistance to the penetration of the metal tube. A full ten foot core is taken in a matter of seconds. The quicker the better. The faster you drive the tube down, the less timec water has to move, and so the less compaction. The impregnating resin is introduced after the core is taken, under pressure, in an autoclave, and replaces most of the water.
I was using these techniques in 1983 [and Hal Wanless who showed them to me had been using them for many years before that]. When I came back to the UK in 1989, I found no-one here using this methodology.

I did try impregnating a marine peat, from Biscayne Bay, once, but for some reason, there was a reaction between the peat and the resin.
My Slapton "peat" was actually an almost liquid organic sludge at the surface, quickly compacting to a "peat"at depth, not a sphagnum peat.

Feb 22, 2018 at 3:52 PM | Unregistered CommenterSupertroll

tomo, forgot to add......

The US has Musk, and Tesla, financed by US Taxpayers and still losing money, whilst achieving nothing.

The Chinese leadership is not that stupid. This would not stop them replicating the viable technical developments.

Feb 22, 2018 at 3:17 PM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

Local papers aren't really local, but rather many stories are made at the same time in a remote office by creating a template and plugging local details in.
"North Lincolnshire joining the green revolution as electric car ownership soars"
Right they mean that there were 2 cars and now there are 3 ?
Alright the council and virtue signalling orgs have a few cars.
So yes 52 were bought last year adding to existing 82
At that rate in 100 years time they'll be 5,000 electric cars
..then you get to bottom that 5,000 would be 5%
Cos our area has almost 100,000 cars.
There's another trick it says "plug in vehicles", so that's not 100% electric , but includes hybrid cars.

Feb 22, 2018 at 3:16 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

Feb 21, 2018 at 11:26 PM | tomo

The Chinese Government may claim to be Communist on the outside, but on the inside, they are anything but Communist!

The Leadership does not need to make decisions for short, medium or long term political gain. They are building the power and wealth of China as a worldwide business, on the basis that they will become very rich themselves, and the population are also benefitting.

The Chinese colonisation of countries with neglected arable land, mineral resources etc, allows Chinese entrepreneurs to get richer, with tax and backhanders paid to the Leadership.

China does not have enough coal. It is dependent on Australia. It does not have spare agricultural land to waste time with Biofuels. It has totally dominated solar panel production, so could provide limited domestic power for its new Colonies, quickly and cheaply, whilst coal powerstations are constructed.

China has no oil, and does not like (who does?) being at the mercy of other countries and world events.

China needs to find its own oil, or colonise a country with oil reserves. If a Government combined with private enterprise has an incentive to develop hydrogen fuel cells etc, with hydrogen generated by solar, it is China. With State intervention, they could control the home market to create economies of scale, and then export.

Feb 22, 2018 at 3:09 PM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

PostCreate a New Post

Enter your information below to create a new post.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>