Click images for more details
A few sites I've stumbled across recently....
@PhilipB "DECC needs to answer this question: “why did demand response get 1 year contracts and new generation capacity get 15 years”? Both take time and effort to set up, "- why would I commit to DR for mega power furnaces for 15 years if most such biz is moving abroad ?- A nice trick would be if I know I am in my final year of operation and winding down production would be to sign a 1 year DR contract with DECC.
More spectacular Goldenberg excreta in the Guardian - now Iceland is levitating because of the massive icecap melting that's not happening there, giving rise to volcanic eruptions. Nothing whatever to do with a mid-Atlantic rift. That'll be the overwhelming consensus view that plate tectonics is fairytale-laden denialism then. And consensus never fails.
Tomo: relax. Have a read at the only comment made, so far, on the Alternatives Journal (“Canada’s Environmental Voice”) – it is far from complimentary about the article. Add your “tick” in support, as well.
tomo --Even if that article is correct -- and wouldn't the meltwater contain dissolved organic carbon and CO2? -- the authors talk of 15 Tg of carbon cumulative by 2050, call it 0.5 TgC per year. Compare this to annual anthropogenic emissions of about 10 PgC -- that is, 10,000 TgC. "Substantial"? "Catastrophic"? Hardly.
I know... what irks is that the "professional" media is polluted with this garbage - and the "professionals" targeted regularly point out the lies, misrepresentations and so on... - but the baboons bashing away with mouse and keyboard keep pushing out this "whoah!! we're doomed" stuff.
Here is more insanity from DECC, giving our money away to generators to do what they would do anyway, ie generate electricity to meet demand. UK “capacity market” is not a market – it’s state aid (£1 billion/year)
@Tomo I think we have to just tune out.. You know this stuff is all part of their religion and they feel compelled to share he message of the day. Even failing to understand sometimes that they are a journalist and are not supposed to push a line. they just cant help it. One can waste time going into details and really check that they are the BS they first seem.But normaly you can just wait. Like how many people are pushing magic biofuel$ these days ?
Cumbrian Lad - yes, that's the one. That's the trouble with driving; need to concentrate on the road rather than the radio especially when taking a new route home and trying to remember it for the next time - all to cut a couple of miles and a few villages out of the journey. Might be time to invest in GPS but I prefer to keep the memory sharpened.
Grumpy - I remember hearing the comments about nitrogen and fossil fuel dependence. It was talking about the Haber-Bosch process. Was it on the 15min programme before You and yours? there is a series in that slot at present that seems to cover all sorts of random stuff.
Jan 29, 2015 at 11:53 PM | Unregistered CommenterCumbrian Lad
I got a circular "news" email pointing here at one of my work accounts - a re-hash of this - which in turn - is a re-hash from here ($$$)
Down through three layers of linguistically and logically tortured re-interpretation with the word "catastrophic" wheeled out everywhere ....
Exasperation is close (but inadequate) to what I feel about the "sausage machine of doom...."
Stewgreen: that article you linked to should become national reading. If ever there was a paper that shows the utter stupidity of the people involved in this scam, that is it. It is an article riddled with self-contradiction, often with conflicts within the same sentence!
Close to 9 in 10 people (88%) agree that the world’s climate is changing…
The flooding events were seen as a sign of things to come
It then goes on to show that most people saw that the flooding had more to do with “habitat management” (to coin a phrase) than with “climate change”:
…insufficient investment in flood defences (77% felt this), poor river and coastal management (75%), development including in flood-prone areas (73%)…
Our findings demonstrate that an association between last year’s winter flooding and climate change has been forming in the minds of many ordinary people in Britain, who also view these events as a sign of things to come.
Then there is the killer:
Perhaps we should now ask whether it is time to banish climate scepticism once and for all…[my bold]
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.