Nonconsensus
Jun 4, 2014
Bishop Hill in Climate: Sceptics, Foreign

An interesting headline in the Australian - paywalled, so I can't see the rest of the article:

AUSTRALIA’S peak body of earth scientists has declared itself unable to publish a position statement on climate change due to the deep divisions within its membership on the issue.

After more than five years of debate and two false starts, Geological Society of Australia president Laurie Hutton said a statement on climate change was too difficult to achieve.

This is very interesting, because it suggests that the society has actually asked its members what they think. What a refreshing contrast to the learned societies in the UK, whose politically inclined leaderships are happy to issue statements in the names of their members without batting an eyelid.

Update on Jun 4, 2014 by Registered CommenterBishop Hill

What fun to recall the Royal Society's attitude:

 

In the past we have been able to give advice to governments as a Society without having to seek consensus of all the members.

Article originally appeared on (http://www.bishop-hill.net/).
See website for complete article licensing information.