A couple of interesting climategate postings over at Nature's website - some more statements from Phil Jones, the most startling of which is this:
I don't think we should be taking much notice of what's on blogs because they seem to be hijacking the peer-review process.
Golly. I can't imagine for a minute which journals have had their peer review process hijacked by us motley band of sceptics.
Then there's this piece by Daniel Cressey, who does a reasonable job of rounding up the developments on the Russell Review and the latest errors from the IPCC. He then blows it unfortunately by suggesting that readers head over to RealClimate to get a good dose of truth, which looks slightly foolish given that these are the guys who are being investigated.
Unless Daniel Cressey, like his boss Philip Campbell, knows something about the outcome of the review already.